David R. Usher
January 20, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
If you believe that Jews caused the holocaust, then Senator Joe Biden is your prophet on the issue of domestic violence. America’s most dangerous bully is out to destroy every man in America on the vitriolic feminist notion that domestic violence is caused only by men; and secondly, to export America’s insanity to the rest of the world.
Biden’s plan is to create a “legal brigade” – an army in excess of 100,000 lawyers trained (and some federally endowed) to act as clones of the infamous Duke prosecutor Mike Nifong.
Biden would also spend millions of federal dollars on I-VAWA, exporting radical feminism to many foreign countries via the World Health Organization and various U.N. feminist NGO’s. I-VAWA is admittedly just another scheme by the Women’s Edge Coalition to create global-feminist socialism: “A major goal of the campaign is to educate the U.S. public and policymakers about the inextricable link between violence against women and the biggest global development and human rights challenges of our time: poverty, war and conflict, HIV/AIDS, and public health.”
Are we so stupid as to let feminist globallists abuse the “A” word to take over the world?
America: where self-proclaimed victims power predatory government
Senator Biden likes to compare the federal government to a lawnmower --- in his vision an army of over 100,000 entitled lawnmowers --- chopping down men with billions of federal entitlements, on nothing more than an allegation that domestic violence by men is globally endemic. Entitling violence by women in the name of building a safer world has been the screed of the fascist insurgency in Congress and state legislatures for many years.
If America had not personally witnessed a large number of men being publicly bullied and tortured by predatory feminist pimps, if our brains were turned to sludge and hearts hued from flamed granite, if men were not created equal and the Constitution was interred in the National Cemetery in an unmarked grave, and if all of science were reduced to feminist ideations; we still could not believe Mr. Biden.
Dorothy Rabinowitz, who spent years debunking the false child abuse industry, essentially agrees with my long-held view that false domestic violence charges became the feminist favorite because they do not require the programming of a child. In the Wall Street Journal she writes, “there is little that is new or strange about Mr. Nifong. We have seen the likes of this district attorney, uninterested in proofs of innocence, willing to suppress any he found, many times in the busy army of prosecutors claiming to have found evidence of rampant child abuse in nursery schools and other child-care centers around the country in the 1980s and throughout most of the '90s.”
The structural parallels between the false child-abuse allegation industry, and VAWA -- which is powered by any allegation of violence made by women, are striking. Both programs are structured to endlessly research and elicit allegations of abuse from a special class of pre-assigned victims, to act as the “validator” of abuse, to entitle hyper-aggressive prosecution and treatment of it, to seize large amounts of money from the alleged perpetrator, and to absolve anyone who abuses the system. We should not be surprised at the soporific efficacy of this arrangement: what dog won’t bark if you offer it a bone, or eventually bite to get what it wants?
Duke prosecutor Mike Nifong taught America invaluable lessons in the Duke Scandal. Women do lie – repetitively -- for money and power. Police, prosecutors, the Bar Association, psychologists, and testing agencies do lie for them – because it is thought to be politically correct, is an entitled activity, and conveniently profitable.
*
New Jersey Nets player Jason Kidd had to file for divorce to avoid continuing entitled violence at the hands of his wife.
*
David Letterman was dragged through an outrageous and expensive false allegation of stalking.
*
Tawana Brawley orchestrated a hideous false rape case against six innocent men.
*
Actor Phil Hartman was shot to death by his drug-infested wife. Hartman had been walking on eggshells around her violence for some time.
*
After a brief marriage to Heather Mills, Beatle Paul McCartney discovered that his wife was a former call-girl, a violent wife, gold-digger, and a professional at making false abuse accusations. We are to believe that Paul somehow became a monster after having a long and wonderful marriage to his first wife, Linda, who passed away from cancer. Paul was not the only person Heather physically attacked. She is currently demanding $50-million from Sir Paul, her latest and greatest trick.
*
There are thousands of innocent men who spent much of their lives in prison, who since the advent of DNA evidence, are being acquitted of their crimes. There are countless others for which DNA evidence is not available, or who were too poor to fight the system -- convicted purely on the feminist-instilled assumption that men are guilty even if they can prove themselves innocent. I have hundreds of gut-wrenching letters from good men, sitting in prison, for this very reason. Their truths will never be seen on CNN or a feminist U.N. Report.
Exporting the Scourge of Radical Feminism
Biden mistakenly hopes to broaden his Presidential possibilities by pulling a “Nifong” on the world. His plan would spend hundreds of millions of our tax dollars to export the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) around the world. Biden’s plan is based on the WHO study, “Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women.”
Unfortunately for Mr. Biden, the WHO study is integrally cross-referenced to Kofi Annan’s Report on Violence Against Women, which was unanimously rejected by the U.N. Third Committee this past November after an international brouhaha revealed that intentional sex bias and tremendous methodological errors rendered the report little more than an exercise in brute sexism.
The WHO report is built on the same preceptual, methodogical and scientific errors as the Secretary General’s report. It starts with a monumental feminist lie “the perpetrators of violence are almost exclusively men.” The questioning methodology was similar to that of the Conflict Tactical Scales (CTS), asking forthright questions such as “whether a current or former spouse has ever (fill in the blank). Unlike the CTS, which questioned both men and women, the W.H.O. study carefully avoids asking what feminists do not wish to report (just like Mike Nifong). Only women pre-selected by feminist-operated NGO’s an operatives were interviewed.
Perhaps Mr. Biden would do better spending hundreds of millions of our tax dollars asking Democrats meaningful questions like “has a Republican ever voted against one of your bills?”
The bottom line: Exporting radical feminist terrorism is a very dangerous thing. The vast majority of Muslims know exactly what radical feminism is, and they are not about to let America ram it down their throats under the guise of “Democracy.” As we found out: some are willing to strap a bomb on their back to prove their point.
If Senator Biden wants to stop terrorism, which he claims to desire, he can start by shelving this horrid piece of legislation. He should follow through by undertaking what he forcefully quashed last year: reform of the Violence Against Women Act to become a truly gender-neutral Family Violence Act. When we stop terrorizing America and globalizing radical feminism, we will be well on the way to ending the global war on terror.
© 2007 David Usher - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
David R. Usher is Legislative Analyst for the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition and is a co-founder and past Secretary of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children.
E-Mail: drusher@swbell.net
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Media Class = MSM
Two conservative commentators expose the new Media Class
"Radical: Naturally inherent, essential, fundamental; going to the root"
"Right: Correct, true, proper; just and fair"
Denver - Media Class Circling The Wagons Around Obama
28 August 2008
On this website we argue that a powerful new Class now dominates the USA and several other Western Nations. We call it the Media Class and besides those directly owning and working in the Media, we include in this Class those in industries that have become inextricably linked with the Media such as professional sport, Fashion, Advertising, the Arts and Entertainment. We maintain that in the USA this Class has turned the Democrat Party into its political creature by bestowing its favors on some politicians and causes and demonizing others. We maintain that it was in Hollywood, the birthplace of this Class, that rich and powerful Media insiders decided to drop the Clintons and promote Obama for the Presidency. Eventually, the whole Class fell into line and Mrs. Clinton, once the anointed one was discarded. In past articles we point out why Obama appealed to the Hollywood activists and why their choice was so superficially made.
Now, in Denver, the Media Class is stuck with a candidate of very limited abilities. Never properly vetted about his past and assumed to be able to win by speaking the lines written for him, Obama finds himself trailing the pedestrian and underfunded John McCain in the opinion polls. His choice of a running mate, whilst pleasing to his masters in the Media for whom abortion and homosexual liberation are litmus test issues, has revealed his complete lack of imagination and insight into Presidential politics. We have long argued that the Media Class sponsors and controls Leftist politicians (and intimidates conservatives) and uses them to promote its own revolutionary social agenda. It is this process that has given rise to what many call the ‘culture war’.
On 20th August, Jim Meyers wrote an article on Newsmax.com in which he drew attention to the fact that the Media had selected Obama and he quoted from Brent Bozell’s findings for a Media Research Center study. It seems that more and more conservative commentators are realizing that the mainstream media is controlling the Democrat Party and not vice-versa. Perhaps they should start asking how and why this is happening though they could save intellectual energy by reading our website, for all would be revealed!
Rush Limbaugh mentioned this week that there are about 4,000 Democrat delegates at Denver this week and some 20,000 media people. It seems to us very appropriate that the Media people are dominant at this event. The delegates cannot be relied upon to perform well and neither can the candidates. The Clinton supporters and their leader are understandably bitter about the way that she was abandoned despite a better showing than Obama in the primaries. Even the Clintons, long used to Media cosseting, now realize that they have been discarded and are expected to fall into line unless they wish to risk being ‘outed’ by their erstwhile sponsors. Will they do so? The massed Media is at Denver to make sure that no matter how events unfold in the Conference hall the public will be informed that Obama, his running mate and all the delegates are united and euphoric.
The Media Class often acts impulsively and shows poor judgment, as the selection of Obama demonstrates, but we have to admire its speed, skill and boldness when redressing a mistake. On this website, we mostly track the Wall Street Journal because although it has the reputation of being a conservative voice and providing authentic news, it is, like all MSM (Mainstream Media) organs a propaganda machine for the Media Class agenda. Only in its opinion pages can any conservative views be found (already under the Murdoch influence more and more Leftist opinion writers are being featured) and the rest of its many pages are written by ‘reporters’ who believe that their job is to rewrite the news to advance a revolutionary social agenda. After the debacle this weekend of the Biden selection and its linkage to the unwelcome issue of abortion the WSJ had as its Monday top front-page news story a headline “Democrats Begin Their Final Assault” and beside it a picture of Biden with a young girl over his shoulder who was waving to the camera man. Underneath was the caption “Sen. Joe Biden with his granddaughter Natalie Biden following Catholic church services in Greenville, Del. Sunday”. This is the Joe Biden who completely rejects the Catholic teaching on abortion and has voted to ensure that babies who survive the grisly process of abortion are left to starve to death. One has to admire a Media that can move so quickly to mislead Catholic voters. Media people love abortion and are united on the issue with their Leftist foot-soldiers and Feminazi activists, but they know that it is not a vote-getter in (still-overwhelmingly) Christian America.
On Tuesday the same space was occupied with a photo of Michelle Obama and her daughter and the caption “ONSTAGE: Michelle Obama and daughter Sasha at the podium before the convention opened Monday”. We are being reminded that these people (who actually approve the killing of countless babies for the abstract right of a woman’s convenience) are really family people surrounded by children.
Today (Wednesday) in the same spot is a picture of Hillary Clinton prior to her speech and a caption forecasting that she will be urging Party unity. The whole news MSM is currently doing everything it can to promote Democrat unity, to advise Obama on how to win and to portray the Party as united behind Obama and in buoyant mood. We can forecast that in stark contrast the MSM will be doing the exact opposite at the Republican conference.
For those who swallow the MSM propaganda, the Presidential contest is partly about personality and partly about issues like taxation, foreign policy, trade, health care and jobs. Whilst all these things do matter to many American voters, they are secondary to the underlying struggle which the Media Class would prefer to camouflage, and that is the culture war. For this new dominant Class, the election is seen as the opportunity to gain sufficient political power to impose legislation that will consign old-fashioned morality to the dustbin of history. In California, Prop 8 will be on the ballot, thanks to those old-fashioned religious people that the Media Class and its Leftist foot-soldiers hate with a ferocity that can only be appeased with complete victory. Prop 8, if passed, will restore marriage to its traditional definition as being between a man and a woman. I think Prop 8 will lose this time because all the big money is pouring in to defeat it and thus open the floodgates of same-sex marriage in every other State. Business people and individuals who donate money to support Prop 8 are being ‘outed’ by the militant homosexuals and subjected to threats of boycott. Meanwhile, big companies are donating large sums of stockholders money to the homosexual campaign to defeat the Proposition and added to their contributions are the millions from the rich and famous of Hollywood and San Francisco. Here is the real frontline of the culture war and I am afraid that the masses are being kept in the dark by the Media.
I wrote in my previous article that a reader was forwarding newspaper clippings of the Media-orchestrated furore in the UK’s tiny village of Broadclyst, Devon. Here are the headlines from the local rag. “Residents left furious after secret BNP rally is held in village hall”. “Residents angered by secret party meeting”. “Police called by pair who felt threatened by BNP canvassers”. “Mum takes kids out of village youth club led by BNP member”. All the outraged complainers are anonymous and one is led to assume that the intrepid reporter, Miss Liz Taverner, had to search diligently to find a handful of them and that they were not likely to be very credible with their neighbors, hence the anonymity. Still, this is the way that the Media in the UK always reports on the BNP. The event in the village hall was a meeting and not a rally and it was not advertised by the BNP because Leftist thugs, usually with a nod and wink from the police hierarchy, ensure that BNP meetings are disrupted or prevented. The reporter knows this, of course, but the meeting secrecy is portrayed as sinister. What was surprising was the printed response from the newspaper’s website, for many local people who unashamedly revealed their names, complained that they would have attended the meeting if they had known about it, for they liked the BNP’s message. Others defended free speech and free association.
One writer drew attention to the BNP’s reality behind its appealing public message. Sadly, he has a point for the Party’s organization and core beliefs are rooted not just in economic Socialism and the notion of racial purity but also in the Leninist doctrine of ‘democratic centralism’. This latter means that the Party leadership promotes Party members to Party posts instead of allowing them to be elected by the rank-and-file membership. The rationale for this is that as a Party that is heavily persecuted it cannot allow infiltrators to gain control. It is an argument that has validity but the consequence is a Party that is ruled by a clique that has to carry out frequent purges of any who show independent thought. It seems that the Party is now having another purge and I suspect that Nick Griffin is ensuring that no-one takes advantage of the Party’s claim to allow an annual challenge to his leadership. The Party never reveals the policy disagreements that result in expulsions. Is Griffin a reformer battling veteran racial extremists or is he battling reformers? There is no way of knowing for all internal disputes seem to be about personalities and alleged plots. Since the BNP is the UK’s natives’ only hope of survival, it is disastrous if its activists are continually being purged and no impressive independent-minded personalities are allowed to emerge. Worse still is that Party dogmas cannot be challenged. If Nick Griffin or one of his close supporters would like to deny our conclusions, we would welcome their contribution on this website.
Copyright Mr Radical and Mr Right Radical and Right ©2008
"Radical: Naturally inherent, essential, fundamental; going to the root"
"Right: Correct, true, proper; just and fair"
Denver - Media Class Circling The Wagons Around Obama
28 August 2008
On this website we argue that a powerful new Class now dominates the USA and several other Western Nations. We call it the Media Class and besides those directly owning and working in the Media, we include in this Class those in industries that have become inextricably linked with the Media such as professional sport, Fashion, Advertising, the Arts and Entertainment. We maintain that in the USA this Class has turned the Democrat Party into its political creature by bestowing its favors on some politicians and causes and demonizing others. We maintain that it was in Hollywood, the birthplace of this Class, that rich and powerful Media insiders decided to drop the Clintons and promote Obama for the Presidency. Eventually, the whole Class fell into line and Mrs. Clinton, once the anointed one was discarded. In past articles we point out why Obama appealed to the Hollywood activists and why their choice was so superficially made.
Now, in Denver, the Media Class is stuck with a candidate of very limited abilities. Never properly vetted about his past and assumed to be able to win by speaking the lines written for him, Obama finds himself trailing the pedestrian and underfunded John McCain in the opinion polls. His choice of a running mate, whilst pleasing to his masters in the Media for whom abortion and homosexual liberation are litmus test issues, has revealed his complete lack of imagination and insight into Presidential politics. We have long argued that the Media Class sponsors and controls Leftist politicians (and intimidates conservatives) and uses them to promote its own revolutionary social agenda. It is this process that has given rise to what many call the ‘culture war’.
On 20th August, Jim Meyers wrote an article on Newsmax.com in which he drew attention to the fact that the Media had selected Obama and he quoted from Brent Bozell’s findings for a Media Research Center study. It seems that more and more conservative commentators are realizing that the mainstream media is controlling the Democrat Party and not vice-versa. Perhaps they should start asking how and why this is happening though they could save intellectual energy by reading our website, for all would be revealed!
Rush Limbaugh mentioned this week that there are about 4,000 Democrat delegates at Denver this week and some 20,000 media people. It seems to us very appropriate that the Media people are dominant at this event. The delegates cannot be relied upon to perform well and neither can the candidates. The Clinton supporters and their leader are understandably bitter about the way that she was abandoned despite a better showing than Obama in the primaries. Even the Clintons, long used to Media cosseting, now realize that they have been discarded and are expected to fall into line unless they wish to risk being ‘outed’ by their erstwhile sponsors. Will they do so? The massed Media is at Denver to make sure that no matter how events unfold in the Conference hall the public will be informed that Obama, his running mate and all the delegates are united and euphoric.
The Media Class often acts impulsively and shows poor judgment, as the selection of Obama demonstrates, but we have to admire its speed, skill and boldness when redressing a mistake. On this website, we mostly track the Wall Street Journal because although it has the reputation of being a conservative voice and providing authentic news, it is, like all MSM (Mainstream Media) organs a propaganda machine for the Media Class agenda. Only in its opinion pages can any conservative views be found (already under the Murdoch influence more and more Leftist opinion writers are being featured) and the rest of its many pages are written by ‘reporters’ who believe that their job is to rewrite the news to advance a revolutionary social agenda. After the debacle this weekend of the Biden selection and its linkage to the unwelcome issue of abortion the WSJ had as its Monday top front-page news story a headline “Democrats Begin Their Final Assault” and beside it a picture of Biden with a young girl over his shoulder who was waving to the camera man. Underneath was the caption “Sen. Joe Biden with his granddaughter Natalie Biden following Catholic church services in Greenville, Del. Sunday”. This is the Joe Biden who completely rejects the Catholic teaching on abortion and has voted to ensure that babies who survive the grisly process of abortion are left to starve to death. One has to admire a Media that can move so quickly to mislead Catholic voters. Media people love abortion and are united on the issue with their Leftist foot-soldiers and Feminazi activists, but they know that it is not a vote-getter in (still-overwhelmingly) Christian America.
On Tuesday the same space was occupied with a photo of Michelle Obama and her daughter and the caption “ONSTAGE: Michelle Obama and daughter Sasha at the podium before the convention opened Monday”. We are being reminded that these people (who actually approve the killing of countless babies for the abstract right of a woman’s convenience) are really family people surrounded by children.
Today (Wednesday) in the same spot is a picture of Hillary Clinton prior to her speech and a caption forecasting that she will be urging Party unity. The whole news MSM is currently doing everything it can to promote Democrat unity, to advise Obama on how to win and to portray the Party as united behind Obama and in buoyant mood. We can forecast that in stark contrast the MSM will be doing the exact opposite at the Republican conference.
For those who swallow the MSM propaganda, the Presidential contest is partly about personality and partly about issues like taxation, foreign policy, trade, health care and jobs. Whilst all these things do matter to many American voters, they are secondary to the underlying struggle which the Media Class would prefer to camouflage, and that is the culture war. For this new dominant Class, the election is seen as the opportunity to gain sufficient political power to impose legislation that will consign old-fashioned morality to the dustbin of history. In California, Prop 8 will be on the ballot, thanks to those old-fashioned religious people that the Media Class and its Leftist foot-soldiers hate with a ferocity that can only be appeased with complete victory. Prop 8, if passed, will restore marriage to its traditional definition as being between a man and a woman. I think Prop 8 will lose this time because all the big money is pouring in to defeat it and thus open the floodgates of same-sex marriage in every other State. Business people and individuals who donate money to support Prop 8 are being ‘outed’ by the militant homosexuals and subjected to threats of boycott. Meanwhile, big companies are donating large sums of stockholders money to the homosexual campaign to defeat the Proposition and added to their contributions are the millions from the rich and famous of Hollywood and San Francisco. Here is the real frontline of the culture war and I am afraid that the masses are being kept in the dark by the Media.
I wrote in my previous article that a reader was forwarding newspaper clippings of the Media-orchestrated furore in the UK’s tiny village of Broadclyst, Devon. Here are the headlines from the local rag. “Residents left furious after secret BNP rally is held in village hall”. “Residents angered by secret party meeting”. “Police called by pair who felt threatened by BNP canvassers”. “Mum takes kids out of village youth club led by BNP member”. All the outraged complainers are anonymous and one is led to assume that the intrepid reporter, Miss Liz Taverner, had to search diligently to find a handful of them and that they were not likely to be very credible with their neighbors, hence the anonymity. Still, this is the way that the Media in the UK always reports on the BNP. The event in the village hall was a meeting and not a rally and it was not advertised by the BNP because Leftist thugs, usually with a nod and wink from the police hierarchy, ensure that BNP meetings are disrupted or prevented. The reporter knows this, of course, but the meeting secrecy is portrayed as sinister. What was surprising was the printed response from the newspaper’s website, for many local people who unashamedly revealed their names, complained that they would have attended the meeting if they had known about it, for they liked the BNP’s message. Others defended free speech and free association.
One writer drew attention to the BNP’s reality behind its appealing public message. Sadly, he has a point for the Party’s organization and core beliefs are rooted not just in economic Socialism and the notion of racial purity but also in the Leninist doctrine of ‘democratic centralism’. This latter means that the Party leadership promotes Party members to Party posts instead of allowing them to be elected by the rank-and-file membership. The rationale for this is that as a Party that is heavily persecuted it cannot allow infiltrators to gain control. It is an argument that has validity but the consequence is a Party that is ruled by a clique that has to carry out frequent purges of any who show independent thought. It seems that the Party is now having another purge and I suspect that Nick Griffin is ensuring that no-one takes advantage of the Party’s claim to allow an annual challenge to his leadership. The Party never reveals the policy disagreements that result in expulsions. Is Griffin a reformer battling veteran racial extremists or is he battling reformers? There is no way of knowing for all internal disputes seem to be about personalities and alleged plots. Since the BNP is the UK’s natives’ only hope of survival, it is disastrous if its activists are continually being purged and no impressive independent-minded personalities are allowed to emerge. Worse still is that Party dogmas cannot be challenged. If Nick Griffin or one of his close supporters would like to deny our conclusions, we would welcome their contribution on this website.
Copyright Mr Radical and Mr Right Radical and Right ©2008
Obama's Radical Roots And Rules
Saul Alinsky, circa 1946: Like Obama, he wanted "change."
Obama's Radical Roots And Rules
Investors Business Daily
by Editorial
Most Americans revile socialism, yet Barack Obama's poll numbers remain competitive. One explanation: He's a longtime disciple of a man whose mission was to teach radicals to disguise their ideology.
The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee's choice of the word "change" as his campaign's central slogan is not the product of focus-group studies, or the brainstorming sessions of his political consultants.
One of Obama's main inspirations was a man dedicated to revolutionary change that he was convinced "must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, nonchallenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future."
>>>
Obama calls his years as an Alinskyesque community organizer in Chicago "the best education I ever had, and where I learned the true meaning of my Christian faith." But as radicalism expert Richard Lawrence Poe has noted, "Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. In organizing coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer."
Indeed, Alinsky believed in sacrificing ethics and morals for the great cause. "Ethical standards must be elastic to stretch with the times," Alinsky wrote in his last book, "Rules for Radicals," adding that "all values are relative in a world of political relativity."
Published a year before Alinsky's death in 1972, "Rules for Radicals" includes a dedication in which he gives "an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical . . . who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer."
>>>
Barack Obama's "Change We Can Believe In" is simply socialism — imposed by stratagem because Americans have never believed in Marxist economics. Saul Alinsky understood this, and his ghost is alive and well — and threatening to haunt the White House.
SOURCE
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government. ( Our Forefathers new all about Saul Alinsky's type, and long before the creep was born.
--------------------
The 'green revolution' is actually the 'red revolution' in disguise ...
If there is no energy development, you have poverty with a view
Obama's Radical Roots And Rules
Investors Business Daily
by Editorial
Most Americans revile socialism, yet Barack Obama's poll numbers remain competitive. One explanation: He's a longtime disciple of a man whose mission was to teach radicals to disguise their ideology.
The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee's choice of the word "change" as his campaign's central slogan is not the product of focus-group studies, or the brainstorming sessions of his political consultants.
One of Obama's main inspirations was a man dedicated to revolutionary change that he was convinced "must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, nonchallenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future."
>>>
Obama calls his years as an Alinskyesque community organizer in Chicago "the best education I ever had, and where I learned the true meaning of my Christian faith." But as radicalism expert Richard Lawrence Poe has noted, "Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. In organizing coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer."
Indeed, Alinsky believed in sacrificing ethics and morals for the great cause. "Ethical standards must be elastic to stretch with the times," Alinsky wrote in his last book, "Rules for Radicals," adding that "all values are relative in a world of political relativity."
Published a year before Alinsky's death in 1972, "Rules for Radicals" includes a dedication in which he gives "an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical . . . who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer."
>>>
Barack Obama's "Change We Can Believe In" is simply socialism — imposed by stratagem because Americans have never believed in Marxist economics. Saul Alinsky understood this, and his ghost is alive and well — and threatening to haunt the White House.
SOURCE
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government. ( Our Forefathers new all about Saul Alinsky's type, and long before the creep was born.
--------------------
The 'green revolution' is actually the 'red revolution' in disguise ...
If there is no energy development, you have poverty with a view
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Obama's Posters: Message in the Image
April 15, 2008
Peggy Shapiro
There is something unsettling and very familiar in the Obama poster campaign which has plastered his image over the country. The posters depict the same graphic closeup of the candidate with one block word either "Hope," "Change" or "Progress" at the bottom. I knew that I had seen this before, and then it came to me that this image appropriates the graphic style of totalitarian Soviet propaganda. It recalls the idealzed portraits and personality cult of Obama changethe "Beloved Leader" such as Stalin and Lenin. The leader, face illuminated by a "holy" light, looks off to the horizon and sees the truth that is not available to his mere mortal followers, who must look up to his image.
The one-word message offers a simple (simple-minded) promise of a utopian existence. These stenciled words bring to mind They Live, a 1988 film, in which secret alien gods take over Los Angeles and control the inhabitants by subliminal billboard messages which display the word "Obey." Coincidentally or not, the website for the artist, Shepard Fairey, who designed Obama's posters is called Obey and boasts on its homepage, "Manufacturing quality dissent since 1989," and the artist bills himself as an agent of "worldwide propaganda delivery."
LeninPerhaps the common ground between Obama and Fairy is not only technique, but message. Fairy's other work romanticizes revolutionary/terrorist figures. Obama's association with figures such William Ayers, who boasted of a dozen bombings between 1970 and 1974, has been reported often. Obama was among only 22 Senators who opposed an amendment designating Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps a foreign terrorist organization. (Unlike the other 21,however, Obama missed the vote.) Fairy's art also reflects a common theme of the Obama campaign: America is a nation that oppresses. It is the America in which Obama's wife Michelle can take no pride and that Obama's spiritual advisor damns. It is the vision of America and its place in the world by one who is unfamiliar with history and who has the luxury of American freedom to express his distain for the country.
What is then unsettling about the Obama poster campaign is that it may be perfectly suited for a man whose candidacy is based on a personality cult, who promises overly simplistic Cheremedies for complex issues, and who seems to have more respect for America's critics than for the nation he hopes to lead.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
2008 Olympics
I have been had doubts about the Olympics being in China. I read this quote tonight, I guess I'm not alone.
=====================
For only the third time in 72 years (Berlin 1936, Moscow 1980), the games are being hosted by a tyrannical regime, the mind of which was displayed in the opening ceremony featuring thousands of drummers, each face contorted with the same grotesquely frozen grin. It was a tableau of the miniaturization of the individual and the subordination of individuality to the collective. Not since the Nazi's 1934 Nuremberg rally, which Leni Riefenstahl turned into the film "Triumph of the Will," has tyranny been so brazenly tarted up as art.
--- George Will, Aug. 12, 2008
=====================
For only the third time in 72 years (Berlin 1936, Moscow 1980), the games are being hosted by a tyrannical regime, the mind of which was displayed in the opening ceremony featuring thousands of drummers, each face contorted with the same grotesquely frozen grin. It was a tableau of the miniaturization of the individual and the subordination of individuality to the collective. Not since the Nazi's 1934 Nuremberg rally, which Leni Riefenstahl turned into the film "Triumph of the Will," has tyranny been so brazenly tarted up as art.
--- George Will, Aug. 12, 2008
President Bush's Mistake
Bush did make a bad mistake in the war on terrorism. But the Mistake was not his decision to go to war in Iraq . Bush’s Mistake came In his belief that this country is the same one his father Fought for in WWII. It is not!!! Back then they had just come out of a vicious depression. The Country Was steeled by the hardship of that depression, but they still Believed Fervently in this country. They knew that the people had elected Their Leaders, so it was the people's duty to back those leaders. Therefore, When the war broke out the people came together, rallied behind, And Stuck with their leaders, whether they had voted for them or not Or Whether the war was going badly or not. And war was just as Distasteful..... And the anguish just as great then as it is Today. Often there were more casualties in one day in WWII than we have Had in The entire Iraq war. But that did not matter. The people stuck With the President because it was their patriotic duty. Americans put Aside their Differences in WWII and worked together to win that war. Everyone from every strata of society, from young to old pitched In .Small children pulled little wagons around to gather scrap metal For the War effort. Grade school students saved their pennies to buy Stamps for War bonds to help the effort. Men who were too old or medically4F lied About their age or condition trying their best to join the Military. Women doubled their work to keep things going at home. Harsh Rationing Of everything from gasoline, to soap, to butter, was imposed, Yet there Was very little complaining. You never heard prominent people on the radio belittling the President. Interestingly enough in those days there were no fat cat actors And Entertainers who ran off to visit and fawn over dictators of Hostile Countries and complain to them about our President. Instead, They made Upbeat films and entertained our troops to help the troops 'Morale. And a bunch even enlisted. And imagine this: Teachers in schools actually started the day Off with A Pledge of Allegiance, and with prayers for our country and our Troops!!! Back then, no newspaper would have dared to point out certain Weak spots In our cities where bombs could be set off to cause the maximum Damage. No newspaper would have dared complain about what we were doing To catch Spies. A newspaper would have been laughed out of existence if It had Complained that German or Japanese soldiers were being 'tortured' by Being forced to wear women's underwear, or subjected to Interrogation by A woman, or being scared by a dog. There were a lot of things different back then. We were not Subjected to A constant bombardment of pornography, perversion and Promiscuity in Movies or on radio. We did not have legions of crack heads, dope Pushers And armed gangs roaming our streets. No, President Bush did not make a mistake in his handling of Terrorism. He made the mistake of believing that we still had the courage And Fortitude of our fathers. He believed that this was still the Country That our fathers fought so dearly to preserve!! It is not the same country. It is now a cross between Sodom and Gomorrah And the land of Oz. We did unite for a short while after 9/11,But our Attitude changed when we found out that defending our country Would Require some sacrifices. We are in great danger!! The terrorists are fanatic Muslims. They Believe that it is okay, even their duty, to kill anyone who Will not Convert to Islam. It has been estimated that about one third, or over three Hundred Million Muslims, are sympathetic to the terrorists cause ...Hitler and Tojo combined did not have nearly that many potential recruits. So...we either win it - or lose it - and you ain't gonna like Losing!!! Today, for many folks, America is not at war...the military is At War...................... America is at the mall!!!!!!!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)